Where Are the Voices of Recovery?
I read an interesting article this morning from “The Conversation” titled: No more “just say no” — Canadian schools will soon have a roadmap to address student substance use.
To be fair, the article was better than most I read on the subject. It was thoughtful, evidence-based, compassionate in tone, and far more nuanced than the old “Just Say No” era. It correctly pointed out that scare tactics and purely punitive approaches often fail young people. It also recognized developmental stages, school connectedness, relationships, and the limitations of suspension-only policies. That part was genuinely constructive.
But then comes the glaring omission: where are the voices of people who have actually recovered?
We hear endless discussion about systems, structures, stakeholders, and evidence-informed frameworks, yet very little from the men and women who have spent years fighting their way out of addiction and rebuilding their lives.
Would an NFL team trying to build a Super Bowl champion ignore the advice of people who had actually won the Super Bowl? Of course not. They would consult coaches, managers, and analysts, but they would also want the perspective of somebody like Tom Brady, someone who has actually won multiple Super Bowls.
So why is addiction recovery so often discussed without meaningful input from people who have actually recovered?
Where are the men and women with 5, 10, 20, or 30 years of lived recovery who can sit in front of a classroom and say:
“I know exactly what this feels like. I nearly lost my life. Here’s what helped me recover.”
Over time, it has become apparent that institutional expertise often overshadows lived experience. Yet lived experience is a form of expertise too.
I saw this myself during my years as a chiropractor. Insurance adjusters with no clinical experience would sometimes dictate treatment protocols for injured patients. They had policies, statistics, and procedures, but they had never actually treated a patient. There was often a disconnect between theoretical oversight and lived professional reality.
Recovery from addiction is not simply a protocol to follow to obtain a desired outcome. It is relational, experiential, emotional, spiritual, and communal. Young people generally do not respond to abstract policy language. They respond to authenticity. They listen to people who have been through hell and come back. They value people who are authentic, and human.
Modern systems swing toward “harm reduction frameworks,” “tiers of intervention,” and “evidence-informed structures.” The net result is that the human story gets sterilized out of recovery. It becomes less about people and more about policy.
Ironically, even many of the platforms where these conversations take place are structured primarily around academic credentials and institutional affiliation. Researchers, PhD candidates, and policy experts are given a seat at the table, while many qualified people with decades of lived recovery experience remain outside the discussion looking in. They are quietly ignored.
That is not an argument against expertise or education. It is simply a reminder that wisdom can also come from surviving, rebuilding, mentoring others, and living the reality that policies are attempting to address.
Ironically, the article itself hints at the real answer:
school connectedness matters
relationships matter
support matters
exclusion increases harm
youth-partnered approaches work better
Exactly.
So why not place recovered people closer to the center of the conversation?
Ask a young person who they would rather hear from: somebody in a suit quoting policy language, or somebody who has actually lived through addiction and found a way out. I suspect we already know the answer.
Lived recovery contains knowledge. Long-term recovery contains data. Experience matters.
Many of us in the recovery community know people with decades of sobriety and recovery behind them. There is enormous collective wisdom there. There is mentorship. There is human connection. There is hope.
Human beings can endure almost anything as long as they do not have to do it alone.
Recovery is not something only to be studied. It is something to be lived, shared, and passed from one human being to another.
Feel free to join my Readers circle. Click here Reader’s Circle — Dr. Larry Smith